Sustainability is a key factor when specifying timber for landscape design. The sustainability of timber depends largely on the forest from which it is sourced and the management practices applied to that forest. Different forest types—such as natural forests, plantations, and agroforests—have unique impacts on biodiversity, carbon storage, and ecosystem health.
In this guide, we’ll explore how forest type influences timber sustainability and provide practical advice on what landscape architects should consider when specifying timber for projects.
Why Forest Type Matters for Timber Sustainability
The type of forest that produces timber has a direct impact on several critical sustainability factors:
- Biodiversity: Different forest types support varying levels of plant and animal life. Timber sourced from diverse ecosystems often supports greater biodiversity than monoculture plantations.
- Carbon Sequestration: Forests are important carbon sinks. Sustainable forest management ensures that carbon storage is maintained or enhanced, while unsustainable practices can release large amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
- Forest Health: Responsible harvesting methods and forest management practices play a crucial role in maintaining the long-term health of a forest. Poor management can degrade ecosystems, while sustainable forestry supports regeneration and resilience.
- Social and Economic Impact: The sourcing of timber also affects local communities. Forests managed with sustainable practices often contribute to the well-being of local economies, while exploitative forestry can cause environmental and social harm.
Forest Types and Their Impact on Timber Sustainability
1. Natural Forests (Old-Growth Forests)
Natural or old-growth forests are ecosystems that have developed over centuries with minimal human interference. These forests are rich in biodiversity, supporting a wide range of species and complex ecosystems.
- Sustainability Profile: Old-growth forests are vital carbon sinks and critical for preserving biodiversity. Harvesting timber from these forests can have severe environmental impacts, including loss of species, habitat destruction, and disruption of carbon storage.
- Best Practice: Timber should ideally not be sourced from old-growth forests, as the environmental costs are often too high. However, where it is sourced, it must be done under the strictest sustainability certifications, such as FSC® (Forest Stewardship Council) certification, which ensures responsible management.
- What to Look For: If old-growth timber is unavoidable, insist on certification and documentation that shows the forest is responsibly managed.
2. Secondary Forests
Secondary forests are forests that have regrown after being cleared or disturbed by human activity. These forests can eventually resemble old-growth ecosystems, but they are in an earlier stage of development.
- Sustainability Profile: Sourcing timber from secondary forests can be a sustainable option, particularly if the forest is well-managed and allowed to regenerate naturally after harvesting. These forests can offer a renewable source of timber while still providing many of the ecosystem services of old-growth forests, including carbon sequestration and habitat for wildlife.
- Best Practice: Ensure that any timber sourced from secondary forests comes from sustainably managed areas that prioritize regeneration. Certification, such as from the FSC, is key in ensuring responsible harvesting from secondary forests.
- What to Look For: Choose timber that is certified and comes with clear documentation on the forest management practices in place. Secondary forests are a good compromise for sourcing sustainable timber without impacting primary forests.
3. Plantation Forests
Plantation forests are established specifically for timber production. These forests are often monocultures—made up of a single species—and are managed with the primary goal of maximizing timber yield.
- Sustainability Profile: Plantations can be sustainably managed if properly regulated. However, they often come with ecological trade-offs. Monocultures support far less biodiversity than natural forests and can lead to soil degradation, water depletion, and loss of wildlife habitat. On the other hand, plantations reduce pressure on natural forests by providing a renewable timber source.
- Best Practice: Choose timber from plantations that are certified by sustainable forestry programs, such as FSC or PEFC (Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification). These certifications ensure that plantations are managed in ways that minimize environmental damage, protect local ecosystems, and prioritize regeneration.
- What to Look For: Look for plantations that maintain buffer zones of natural forests and promote the use of mixed-species planting, which enhances biodiversity compared to pure monocultures.
Regardless of the forest type, it is also recommended to source timber from certified suppliers. Certification schemes verify that timber comes from forests managed sustainably and ethically, with considerations for environmental, social, and economic impacts.
Conclusion: Choosing the Right Forest Type for Sustainable Timber
When specifying timber for landscape architecture projects, it’s essential to understand how the forest type from which the timber is sourced affects its sustainability. By prioritizing certified timber from responsibly managed forests, landscape architects can reduce the environmental impact of their designs while supporting biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and local communities.
Whether you choose timber from certified plantations, managed natural forests, or agroforestry systems, understanding the forest type and sourcing practices is key to making informed, sustainable decisions. Always look for certification, ask your suppliers the right questions, and prioritize timber that aligns with the sustainability goals of your project.
Contact the Technical Team for direct project assistance.
Back to Knowledge Base
